Advertisement
JTCVS Techniques
Advanced searchSave search
Adult: Mitral Valve: Case Report| Volume 16, P60-63, December 2022

Download started.

Ok

Novel use of a transapical endovascular suction device for mitral valve endocarditis in a high-risk surgical patient with successful cerebral protection

Open AccessPublished:October 13, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.08.034
Novel use of a transapical endovascular suction device for mitral valve endocarditis in a high-risk surgical patient with successful cerebral protection
Previous ArticleQuantitative in vivo assessment of human mitral valve coaptation area after undersized ring annuloplasty repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation
Next ArticleBone cement embolism into the right heart
      Figure thumbnail fx1
      Echo-guided transapical suction aspiration of a mitral valve vegetation.
      We present a novel use of transapical suction aspiration with generous cerebral protection strategy for mitigation of embolic events in endocarditis.

      Case Report

      Patient Presentation

      A 79-year-old man presented with a deep sternal wound infection 3 weeks after emergent repair of a ventricular perforation sustained during arrhythmia ablation. This was aggressively treated with sternal debridement and negative pressure wound therapy in preparation for plastic surgery reconstruction. Clinically, the patient progressed but began experiencing crescendo transient ischemic attacks. Echocardiography revealed a new mobile density at the base of the anterior mitral leaflet (Figure 1) as well as new small infarcts on imaging.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Echocardiographic demonstration of the mitral valve vegetation.
      Traditional cardiac surgery was considered high risk because of: 1) severe left ventricular dysfunction, 2) moderate aortic and mitral valve disease (Videos 1 and 2), 3) a densely adherent and inflamed operating field, and 4) the need for a timely plastic surgical wound closure. We candidly offered standard of care mitral valve surgery,
      • AATS Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis Consensus Guidelines Writing Committee Chairs
      • Pettersson G.B.
      • Coselli J.S.
      • Writing Committee
      • Pettersson G.B.
      • Coselli J.S.
      • et al.
      2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) consensus guidelines: surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: executive summary.
      J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 1241-1258.e29
      which the patient refused. We alternatively offered off-label AngioVac (Angiodynamics) use to remove the vegetation. The patient elected to proceed with off-label treatment.

      Procedure

      This complex operation merged cardiac surgery, interventional cardiology, advanced echocardiography, and perfusion disciplines (The full procedure is available as Video 3). The left ventricular apex was exposed through a small left fifth interspace incision and secured with concentric pledgeted polypropylene purse-string sutures. Simultaneously, the right common femoral artery and vein along with the right radial artery were percutaneously accessed and the patient was heparinized to an activated clotting time of 250.
      The Sentinel cerebral protection system (Boston Scientific)—a 2-stage embolic protection device—was inserted via the right radial artery and deployed into the innominate and left common carotid artery. An 8-French (F) occluding balloon was inserted via the right femoral artery and advanced to the ostium of the left subclavian artery to complete the cerebral protection strategy. This completed the positioning of our cerebral protection strategy (Video 4).
      The left ventricular apex was accessed at a location where echocardiographic orthogonal planes predicted smooth passage of an Amplatz wire into the ascending aorta while avoiding the mobile vegetation and subvalvular mitral apparatus (Video 5). A 26-F sheath was placed through the ventricular apex and positioned at the vegetation. A 16-F venous return sheath was placed into the right femoral vein and the AngioVac circuit was completed (Figure 2) and deaired.
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Diagram of the vascular access sites.
      The AngioVac cannula was inserted through the transapical sheath and positioned close to the vegetation. The left subclavian balloon was inflated. The AngioVac was activated and navigated with echocardiography and fluoroscopy using multiple passes (Video 6) until adequate removal of the vegetation was confirmed (Video 7). Heparin was reversed and all sheaths and catheters were removed. The left ventricular apex purse strings were tied and the thoracotomy was closed in a standard fashion. The patient was transported to the intensive care unit. A postprocedural echocardiogram revealed 1-2+ mitral regurgitation (MR).

      Hospital Course

      Postoperatively the patient did well and experienced no further neurologic sequelae. The patient's sternal wound was subsequently closed by Plastic Surgery and the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility with a 6-week course of cefazolin. He returned to home 1 month later.
      The patient was serially followed by Internal Medicine and Cardiology. Progressive echocardiograms revealed increasing MR to 3-4+ MR. The patient refused additional interventions for his MR.
      Approximately 4 months later the patient presented to the emergency room with symptoms of heart failure and expired in the emergency room shortly thereafter of unknown cause. His last echocardiogram was performed approximately 2 weeks before expiration and again revealed 3-4+ MR.

      Discussion

      This case represents the second report
      • Gerosa G.
      • Longinotti L.
      • Bagozzi L.
      • D’Onofrio A.
      • Zanella F.
      • Pittarello D.
      • et al.
      Transapical aspiration of a mitral mass with the AngioVac system on a beating heart.
      Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 110: e445-e447
      of transapical suction aspiration of the mitral valve with the AngioVac device. The first case was performed by attaching the AngioVac circuit onto an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit,
      • Gerosa G.
      • Longinotti L.
      • Bagozzi L.
      • D’Onofrio A.
      • Zanella F.
      • Pittarello D.
      • et al.
      Transapical aspiration of a mitral mass with the AngioVac system on a beating heart.
      Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 110: e445-e447
      whereas this case was without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.
      This patient was clearly indicated for surgery via the 2016 consensus guidelines because of worsening endocarditis with embolization.
      • AATS Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis Consensus Guidelines Writing Committee Chairs
      • Pettersson G.B.
      • Coselli J.S.
      • Writing Committee
      • Pettersson G.B.
      • Coselli J.S.
      • et al.
      2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) consensus guidelines: surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: executive summary.
      J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 1241-1258.e29
      However, the patient elected for only less invasive options than traditional cardiac surgery because of his high-risk profile. With our institution's experience with the AngioVac system as well as the aforementioned case report, we found it prudent to offer this treatment as an experimental option to the patient, with full disclosure of its novel and off-label use.
      The key to performing this safely was the generous cerebral protection strategy. Although the AngioVac system uses negative pressure to minimize any embolization risk, by protecting the innominate artery and left common carotid artery with the Sentinel cerebral protection system and the left subclavian artery with balloon occlusion we were able to prevent any cerebral embolic phenomenon. The patient subsequently experienced no subsequent transient ischemic attacks. Examination of the Sentinel cerebral protection system revealed no appreciable solid material.
      This lesion was accessible because of the ventricular-facing aspect. For atrial-facing vegetations or aortic-facing aortic valve vegetations this approach is less appealing. To date we have performed an off-label aortic valve aspiration for a mixed ventricular/aortic-facing vegetation with mixed results. This shows the importance of ascertaining which direction the vegetation is facing to appropriately frame an approach for a given vegetation.
      Finally, it is noted that this technique is not the standard of care for normal endocarditis. Care should be taken to adhere to the consensus guidelines whenever possible. For patients for whom the operative risks are exceedingly high, AngioVac remains an off-label and yet to be fully explored option. This report shows the technical feasibility of mitral valve AngioVac via a transapical approach for embolic event risk reduction as part of a multidisciplinary heart team approach and patient/goal-directed care.

      Supplementary Data

      References

        • AATS Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis Consensus Guidelines Writing Committee Chairs
        • Pettersson G.B.
        • Coselli J.S.
        • Writing Committee
        • Pettersson G.B.
        • Coselli J.S.
        • et al.
        2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) consensus guidelines: surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: executive summary.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 1241-1258.e29
        View in Article
        • Gerosa G.
        • Longinotti L.
        • Bagozzi L.
        • D’Onofrio A.
        • Zanella F.
        • Pittarello D.
        • et al.
        Transapical aspiration of a mitral mass with the AngioVac system on a beating heart.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 110: e445-e447
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: October 13, 2022
      Accepted: August 11, 2022
      Received in revised form: August 10, 2022
      Received: May 12, 2022

      Footnotes

      Disclosures: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

      The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.08.034

      Copyright

      © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

      User license

      Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) |
      How you can reuse Information Icon
      Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0)

      Permitted

      • Read, print & download
      • Redistribute or republish the final article
      • Text & data mine
      • Translate the article
      • Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
      • Sell or re-use for commercial purposes

      Elsevier's open access license policy

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX